...standard in publishing    
       
Home About_us Journals Corporatepolicies contact us frequentlyt ask questionsfrequentlyt ask questions

Standard Scientific Research and Essays (SSRE)


About Advertise Call for Paper Editorial Board Authors Instruction Submit Manuscript Conferences Associations Archive E-books


Standard Scientific Research and Essays Vol.1(4), pp. 72-79, May 2013
Copyright © 2013 Standard Research Journals
 

 

 Research

 

 

Introduction of superior tomato cultivars (Lycopersicun escutentum Mill)

 

Aliyeh Emami1, Malihe Homauni-Far1, Rogieh Razavi1 and *Ali Reza Eivazi2

 

1Faculty Members of Agricultural Research Center of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran

2Associate Professor of Agricultural Research Center of West Azerbaijan province, Iran

 

*Corresponding Author Email: alirezaeivazi@yahoo.com 

 


Accepted 04 May, 2013

Abstract

In order to evaluate of twenty-five tomato cultivars for selecting superior genotype(s), an experiment was carried out in Kahriz station of agricultural research center of west Azerbaijan province at two years of 2010-11. Experimental design was Randomized Complete Blocks with three replications. Combined analysis of variance showed that for agronomical and quality related traits were significant differences. Selb-Jino, TO2, Early-Urbana, Carmina, Cal-J-N and Falat-Shof with more than 10.5kg/m2 had the highest fruit yield. Selb-Jino had more than 260 fruit at per plant, 7.8 flowers at per inflorescence, less than 112 days to first fruit maturity and pH 3.8 at two years. With increasing fruit number at per plant decreased fruit weight. Carmina had 170cm plant height and indeterminate growth. TO4, Chase, Selb-Jino and Carmina with more than 5.2% had the most total soluble solid in fruit. Correlation coefficients of fruit yield with fruit number at per plant (r=0.49*), number of flower in per inflorescence (r=0.48*) were positive and with days to first fruit maturity (r=-0.46*) was negative significant differences. With delaying fruit maturity decreased fruit number (r=-0.78**), increased fruit weight (r=0.80**) and pH (r=0.71**). Therefore, varieties with more fruits had low pH (r=-0.75**). From the point of fruit shape Carmina, Nina, Selb-Jno and BSS282 were quite uniform. To4, TO2 and Chase had the most fruit color and Carmia and Seb-Jino were the lowest values. Fruit firmness of cultivars was in four groups of soft, relatively stiff, stiff and very stiff. Blossom-end rot in cultivars of BSS282, Tima and TO4 were less than other varieties. Sunscald was seen in first harvesting. Low percentage of fruit cracking was observed in more varieties and in Selb-Jino, Cal-J, TO2, Carmina and Early Urbana had more amounts.

KeywordsGenetic diversity, tomato, superior cultivars

 

 

 


Viewing options:

• Abstract
Reprint (PDF) (453KB)

Search Pubmed for articles by:

Eivazi AR

Emami A

 

Search Google Scholar for articles by:

 


 

 
Copyright © 2012 - 2013. Standard Research Journals Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Help