...standard in publishing    
       
Home about_us Journals Corporatepolicies contact us frequentlyt ask questions

Standard Research Journal of Business Management (SRJBM)


Home About Call for Paper Editorial Board Authors Instruction Submit Manuscript Conferences Associations Archive E-books


Standard Research Journal of Business Management Vol1 (1): 1-40, April 2013
Copyright © 2013 Standard Research Journals

 

 

 Research Article


Managing strategic change in public sector

 

Margaret K Chemengich

 

Kenya Reinsurance Plaza, Taifa Roard,Mezzanine Floor, Checha Cyber Café, P.O. Box 50968-00200, Nairobi, Kenya. Email:  chemengichmail@yahoo.com


Accepted 29 March, 2013

Abstract

Public sector organizations worldwide are under pressure to increase efficiency while delivering improved and integrated services.  The public sector remains a central vehicle for delivering development for both developed and developing countries; within a framework crafted to realize economic and allocative efficiency; equity, justice, fairness; security; competitiveness and contestability.  The system should also guarantee sustainability of service even in competitive markets; mitigate against potential failure of privatised services while reducing transaction costs.  The Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) and the New Public Management (NPM) programmes designed to deliver on these objectives have realised mixed outcomes, in particular those that still maintain hierarchical structures of service delivery.   Governance and diffusion of political power in particular remain the critical pillars for effecting change in developing countries public sectors.  Change is inevitable and it is a continuous process.  It determines the long-term direction and performance of the organization by ensuring that careful formulation, effective implementation and continuous evaluation of strategy take place, to ensure access, affordability and equity.  This paper presents the different strategies of implementing strategic changes in public sector, drawing on SAPs and NPM strategies and lessons thereof.  Change is based on the assumptions made; and can be Top-down, Transformational or Strategic. Changes can also be incremental or big bang, with response mechanisms either adapt or evolve in case change is incremental or undergo reconstruction or revolution in the event the change is substantial. A number of mechanisms have been employed in effecting strategic change in the public sector in Africa since the structural reforms of the 80s.  Central to the change process are the level of stakeholder (beneficiaries, providers, funders) involvement and participation, Marketization, regulation and political control, differentiated service delivery levels, shared corporate management and authority, costs and responsibilities, competition and benchmarking, new modalities of service delivery. In any event no one size strategy fits all public sector changes.  Different countries apply the structures differently depending on their unique circumstances.  The guiding principles for process change in change management are centred on politics, systems, coalitions, culture and communication.  But Politics and culture remain critical to any strategic change in public sector.  Leadership, coalitions on need for change, stakeholder involvement, levels of accountability and application of technology are central in delivery of public service.  To remain viable, efficient and effective in responding to the dynamic needs of the citizens, it has to embrace strategies that can enhance improved productivity and the quality of services delivered. Towards this end, a number of strategies to enhance public sector performance are proffered for adaptation by African governments. Kenya since the 80s had embraced political, economic and social strategic changes influencing public sector service delivery.  The defining moments of strategic public sector delivery mechanisms relate to Liberalization and privatisation anchored on Sessional Paper No1 of 1986, on Economic Management for Renewed Growth.  The biggest achievement of the amendment of the constitution in 1991 not only democratized the political field but more importantly the entrenchment of a   fixed 2-term presidency, freedom of information, independence of the judiciary; separation of powers of the different arms of government and the prominence given to the citizens, civil society in demanding for accountability.  The constitutional provisions of Rights and obligations, equity, political representation, freedom of information including the vetting processes of appointments and accountability measures will go a long way in consolidating benefits of accountability.  Technology facilitated service delivery in light of the globalizing social, economic and cultural aspects of life call for E-government service delivery for timely action in a fast moving environment.

Keywords: Marketisation, Commercialisation, Politics, Cultue, Efficiency, Globalisation, Competitiveness, Governance, Accountability, E-service.

 

 

Stand. Res. J. Bus. Manag.

Vol. 1 No. 1

Viewing options:

• Abstract
Reprint (PDF) (885 KB)

Search Pubmed for articles by:

Chemengich MKJ

 

Search Google Scholar for articles by:

 

 



 
Copyright © 2012 - 2013. Standard Research Journals Terms & Conditions  Privacy Policy Help